Sunday, November 16, 2008

James Bond, baby

I've never been a huge James Bond fan. I guess I never did fully grasp what the draw was for guys. Yeah, Bond get the women, the cool gadgets, the fun spy job. But after 87 movies, doesn't that get a little old?

That was until Daniel Craig came along. As long as he's James Bond, I'll keep watching. Those eyes. Those muscles. That scruffy-yet-handsome face. Excuse me while I swoon.

So Scott and I went to see the newest 007 installment and we were a little disappointed. Daniel Craig, of course, did not disappoint, and there was a lot of action and fun gadgets. But the last movie came out - what? three years ago? And this movie picks up right where the last one ended, without any back story to remind you what happened. So we were confused for most of the movie. The plot was a bit thin and we felt that there were story lines that were started but never fully developed. Also, this James Bond is a little "colder" than other ones...you don't quite warm up to him like to you do the other Bonds (and he doesn't get the girl in this movie).

The problem will be magnified when this movie makes its run on Spike or TNT. Usually, each Bond movie is its own encapsulated movie. But this one relies on the previous movie to make any sense. So you really can't watch it in a vacuum.

A word to the interested: unless you're looking for eye candy, watch the last James Bond movie before seeing this one. Maybe you'll leave the theatre feeling a little more fulfilled.

No comments: